雅思小作文作为写作的一个重要部分，它的成败也直接决定了学生是否能够拿到6分以上的分数，一般而言，想要拿到6.5的雅思写作分数，小作文的分数不低于6分。 因此，小编就从雅思考试官网中的配套资料中为大家解析，小作文的标准究竟是如何?
评分标准介绍
Task Achievement
This criterion assesses how appropriately,accurately and relevantly the response fulfils the
requirements set out in the task, using the minimum of 150 words.
解析1：必须按照要求展开文章写作;描写总结数据的主要特征并进行相关比较。
解析2：字数必须达标，150以上。 一般要求在150-175之内就可以。过长显得冗长啰嗦。
Academic Writing Task 1 is a writing task which has a defined input and a largely predictable output. It is basically an informationtransfer task which relates narrowly to the factual content of an input diagram and not to speculated explanations that lie outside the given data.
解析3 ：用已给数据或者图表运用自己的语言，描述出仅仅和事实内容和图形相关的信息。
切忌写出无关信息和数据，甚至自己的推测。简言之，客观性描述数字和图形。
The examiners’ guidelines for marking the Writing scripts are very detailed. There are many different ways a candidate may achieve a particular band score. The candidates’ answers that follow should not be regarded as definitive examples of any particular band score.
以下为同一个题目的不同水平范文示范，考官给出相关的细节解析。 下面我们就来瞧一瞧。
以下是考官针对这篇文章进行的评价，烤鸭们可以看看并参考一下，自我点评一下，自己在文章写作的时候是否存在这样的问题?
Examiner comment
Band 5 考官给出来的分数是5分，以下是具体的怎么计算出来的。
The length of the answer is just acceptable.
整体评价：尚且可以接受。
There is a good attempt to describe the overall trends but the content would have been greatly improved if the candidate had included some reference to the figures given on the graph.Without these, the reader is lacking some important information.
评价①：努力尝试去描写整体趋势;缺乏图中相关数据;此项针对评分标准TR
因此建议添加数据，因为缺乏重要信息!
The answer is quite difficult to follow and there are some punctuation errors that cause confusion.
评价② 缺乏逻辑，存在拼写错误，且已经造成读者困扰。 此项针对评分标准CC 和LR
建议考生学习审题和文章组织，恰当分段并加强单词的背诵。

The structures are fairly simple and efforts to produce more complex sentences are not successful.
评价③句子结构十分简单，尝试使用复杂句，但是频繁错误导致分数停留在5分。此项针对评分标准的GRA
建议考生学习语法知识，夯实语法技巧。
好了，通过这篇文章的整体解析和评分标准的判断，大家不难发现，这篇文章是符合五分的评分标准的。相信也有同学出现类似的情况，也希望大家参考给出的建议进行改善!